The goal: to create a play about Globalization, working with nine creator-performers, aged 17 to 43.
STAGE ONE
Fr., Aug. 27 - Mo., Aug. 30
Below, the DaPoPo Academy Youth Ensemble (DAYE) – Clara Bullock, Jackie Hanlin and Matthew Power – begin the process by discussing Globalization with two of DaPoPo's directors, Kim Parkhill and Garry Williams. What is Globalization? Is there room for morals in Globalization?

For three days in August, the ensemble trains in Suzuki, Viewpoints and Linklater, living and working at Kim's cottage in New Brunswick. The DAYE trio conducts an interview with two local farmers, creates site-specific performances, composes text and commences introductory German studies. Canoeing at dawn provides a meditative highlight, balanced by midnight bonfires. Garry's Mum, Ann Noël, visiting from Germany, provides photo-documentation (see above).
STAGE TWO
Sat., Sept. 4
Focusing on Tourism and Communication, we collect stories, images and experiences. Kim, Zach, Andrew, Matthew, Keelin and Garry commence, armed with notebooks and pencils. We are confined to Kim's work room, locked out of our rehearsal space at Kingsview Academy, presumably due to the impending Hurricane Earl. We drink coffee. The winds pound and rush, trees shatter and split. We lose power. Eat cookies. Continue our work.
We share select literature ("The planet is a living organism!"); anecdotes about travel ("I love to travel!"); newspapers ("Newspapers sell subscriptions!"); television; information flow ("Who do we leave behind?"); corporate fascism ("Corporations can sue governments!"); the Me-Generation ("I ignore my knowledge!"); money ("My mother makes money exchanging currencies!"); comfort/guilt ("My life needs to be comfortable!"); electronic devices ("Do they keep us apart, or bring us together?"); inter-human relationships ("What is good for us?"); edited/created identities ("What is real?"); souvenirs ("Souvenirs should be banned!"); multiculturalism; natural curiosity; and survival.
Sat., Sept. 11
Garry leads physical training in the morning, exploring stretching/dilation, the architecture or geography of the room, weight and balance, shape and repetition, a German lesson and discussion of ideas in the afternoon. In an exercise led by Kim, we each create an image work about a time at which we felt guilty or "right", or innocent. A pattern emerges, pitting groups against individuals, wherein the guilty party cannot always be clearly identified.
Our homework: create text about Globalization – possible an accusation or a defense; song, poem, speech or scene – from the p.o.v. of Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Charles Darwin, Dr. Seuss, the Average Citizen and Jesus.
Thurs., Sept. 16 - Sat., Sept.20
Thursday
We continue to research and rehearse in spurts, working with whom and where we can – today it's Andrew, Zach, Kim and Garry. Where? The Halifax Commons. We proceed to generate lists, notes, sketches and performances, learning more of what we know, inspired by the Globalization we can observe all around us. Jackie and Clara are able join us in the afternoon.
Friday
After a quick brainstorming session, Zach, Kim and Garry able to adopt some useful parameters to propose to the group, fruitful limitations for our continued creation:
1) We have agreed upon a central character, tentatively called Mr. or Mrs. Citizen.
2) The pre-trial unfolds inside our protagonist's head, as an absurd hearing of internal voices.
3) A possible setting presents itself: a futuristic subterranean biosphere.
Kim, Kristi and Garry are among the few who see Cool It!, Ondi Timoner's documentary film about controversial activist Bjørn Lomborg, at the Oxford movie theatre.
Saturday
Group work, 80% of our cast. We begin by manipulating chairs, the rehearsal space and our bodies to describe globalization in movement and metaphor; we graduate into a stream-of-consciousness expression of voices within our heads, generating (sometimes troubling) one-person conversations, and impromptu, fractured monologues about globalization. We find the defense of our life styles comes hardest, while the voices of accusation are clear and strong.
Thurs. 23 - Sat. 25
Our 40+ page booklet of pre-writing in hand, we focus on the defense without really knowing the accused or the charges. Trying to separate the notion of free market capitalism from globalization, we discuss scientific progress, national and international justice as well as immigration/emigration, speculating on benefits for the mass of humanity in terms of the quality of life, liberty and happiness, paraphrasing our charter of rights. Our heads hurt. We create an ensemble-generated list of compelling show ingredients, define globalization eight times and take turns leading exercises, during which we try out some ideas for shapes, staging, images and text: gestural repetition (Kim); a textual/rhythmic crescendo and acceleration (Zach); different languages than English (Garry); image-based text animation (Droodles); a game (Kim); and an act of kindness (Zach).
STAGE THREE
Thurs. Sept. 29 - Sat. Oct. 16
As the form of our piece begins to emerge through a series of guided improvisations, we set ourselves new tasks, begin to see symmetries, patterns and moments of the divinely absurd. Without a script, the usual fears surface: will there be a show? Will there be a script? Will the performances be improvised? What are we ultimately saying about Globalization?
Currently, a Student, our protagonist, confused, overwhelmed and/or disinterested in Globalization, is transported out of her ordinary world of fast food, cel phones and emergencies, into a strange pre-trail hearing, overseen by an incompetent series of historical characters and unlikely candidates. Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, Christopher Columbus and Jesus Christ all bear witness for, and/or against, the Big G-Word, during which time it is trying to be determined whether or not there is a case against Globalization.
We are also exploring the Student's relationship with a homeless person, a drop-out or shut-out from our prosperous global society, a bum in turn belligerent and wise, who brings out the worst in our protagonist. She must, furthermore, face the possibility of a grim future, the Post Now, in which the few are kept alive in a controlled biosphere, living under a new Manifesto of We. The Post Now is a conglomerate of our expectations and fears for the future: total destruction, man-against-man, if not for a forced, or necessary change.